A Fascination With Jesus Christ

Christians would say this was the Resurrection Power. Should we believe them? I would say yes. This is because everybody believes the grave represents death. But for Jesus it was the exact opposite.

Share

Share
Text size
+

It is axiomatic today that the most fascinating figure in human history is Jesus Christ. That perhaps explains why every major religion, even those founded before him, account for his existence, draw from his teachings and somehow find a way to include his story in their description of reality.

For example, in the Talmud and The Toledot Yeshu of the Jews, it is acknowledged that Yeshua was a respected miracle working teacher -even though they believe he practiced magic and led the Israelites astray- who had disciples, was crucified -though they deny his resurrection- and that his disciples reported that he rose as he promised.

The Muslims say he was a significant prophet who was born of a virgin. In fact, the legend that when their prophet destroyed the statues in the Ka’abh, Mecca, he left untouched the statue of Mary and the infant Jesus grew from their reverence for him.

The Baha’i faith believes Jesus came from God, was born of a virgin, was a wise teacher who performed miracles, was crucified and resurrected as atonement for humanity.

The Hindus say he was a holy and wise man, a great teacher and a ‘God’ or an ‘Ishtar’

Hinduism’s cousin Buddhism, say he was an enlightened, holy and a wise teacher.

Because this list is inexhaustible, the question naturally arises; why do all these religions think they must account for Jesus somehow? Does this not make him worthy of some type of examination?

Experts and scholars around the world today have been investigating for years and they are unanimously agreed that Jesus did exist, that contrary to claims in some absurd religious and scholastic quarters, he was not married, was a great moral teacher who was arrested, tried and crucified by the most efficient killing machine the world has ever known, the Romans.

Mark’s gospel tells us that leaving nothing to chance, the Roman governor ordered that a lance be plunged into his chest afterwards. John’s gospel tells us that, confirmed dead, his body was released to a member of the Jewish Sanhedrin, who placed him in a tomb in which no one had ever been laid.

Apart from his timeless teachings, his unbelievable miracles, there is one more fact mentioned about him reading through the gospels, upon which the Christian religion is built, that struck me recently.

Roughly 3 days after his crucifixion, not only did his body disappear from the tomb, his disciples reported seeing, talking to and eating with him. He had risen as he promised! Saint Paul says it is on this fact that the mystery of the Christian religion lay. Many today argue that this is the same reason why Christianity remains the greatest religion in history, and why according to Christians, Jesus remains the eternal hope of mankind.

Good as all these may sound, there are a few  people, atheists, scientists, scholars and members of other religions among them, who have disputed these claims.

In fact, there are those, who in an attempt to explain the resurrection away, claim Jesus did not really die on the cross. For example, in the ‘Passover Plot’, H J Schonfeild claimed the sponge offered Jesus on the cross was not soaked in vinegar but was actually soaked in a drug meant to induce the appearance of death, so the Romans can release him, so his disciples can administer treatment later.

The Ahmadiya Muslims still point to a shrine at Srinagar, Kashmir, India today, purported to be where his true tomb is, having been delivered from the cross and immigrated to India where he lived to a ripe old age.

But is it possible for someone who had just survived the harsh torture of the cross, who needed urgent medical attention, to give his disciples the impression he was the risen conqueror of death or travel the long and tortuous distance from Middle East to Asia?

Jesus’ disciples, Apostle Paul, the Romans and even Jesus’ enemies at the time all attested to his empty tomb, and no one in history have either been able to present his body or offer reasonable explanation why his tomb became empty few days after the crucifixion.

Again, had someone invented the resurrection story, he would not have presented women as prime witnesses when women testimony carried no weight in Jewish law and culture.

However, there appears to be a silent witness to Jesus’ resurrection today.

Within the confines of a cathedral in Turin, Italy exist a piece of linen cloth with an image that remains a scientific enigma. For over 100 years researchers all over the world have been working on it. Many believe this same cloth, which is the most probed, examined and studied artifact in all history, is the same that was described in John’s gospel as Jesus burial cloth.

For those who argue that this cloth is a forgery, studies have showed that the forger would have needed to find a life size adult male, torture him mercilessly, crucify him literally and then wrap the cloth around him to successfully forge it. And for others who argue that it could have been the burial cloth of any crucified figure in the first century since the Romans crucified many people, we ask; what created the image that scientist over the years have put fortune and time on the line trying to understand?

Experts say something extra ordinary happened that left the image, proving it was not a burial cloth for just an ordinary man.

For example, how did this cloth come to adopt 3D, holographic image when looked at in a negative, when photography was not invented until almost 1800 years after it? It was as if something happened that left a signature on that simple cloth for future generations to discover, which experts are now trying to comprehend.

Dame Isabel Piczek, a particle Physicist, is someone who has spent most of her time studying this shroud. She explains that, in General Relativity, for those familiar with astronomy, there is something in the surface of Black Holes called Event Horizon, which is so called because at that point, all the laws of physics changes character drastically. She said from her extensive study of the cloth in Turin, she found that what caused the imprint was something completely new to the laws of physics. Looking at the image left on the cloth, she realized that, considering that the cloth was used to tie up and wrapped the body, and yet still had such a perfect image, it must have been tout and rigid and the body must have hovered inside it with no contact at all. This means there was actually no gravity in the tomb in which the body was lain since the corpse was supposed to be resting on top a slab maybe, inside the tomb. For such an imprint, there must have been a kind of flash, energy beyond normal, responsible for creating the image before the body left it.

Christians would say this was the Resurrection Power. Should we believe them? I would say yes. This is because everybody believes the grave represents death. But for Jesus it was the exact opposite.

If according to astronomers, ‘in the depth of the collapse of an Event Horizon, something known as ‘Singularity’ which started the universe in the ‘Big Bang’ emerges’, and scholars say what left us the remarkable imprint on the cloth was such an awesome energy, then I think the tomb of Christ, rather than represent an end, actually represents a beginning, a new universe, a new life, for all who believe. It was the same Energy that resurrected Jesus from that grave.

I believe 2000 plus years ago, in Palestine, a portion from that Indefinable Force that men call God, took possession of a man we call Jesus, because he emptied himself utterly of himself, and because of that he became the carrier of the name which is above every other name.

This is why I am fascinated with Jesus.

Responses

  1. Bkd
    Yet again, you’ve proven yourself to be quite an incredible writer. I must acknowledge how much effort you’ve made to research this extensively, even though you go to great lengths to debunk researchers who’s results don’t gel with your beliefs.
    Now I am no science expert so don’t expect me to argue against the likes of Isabel Piczek’s findings. I don’t think one has to be a science expert to be able to apply common sense when reading the stories of Jesus, especially when we have the Bible to refer to. The reason I opt for this approach is because it’s simple, basic and wouldn’t leave much room for any real doubts. Besides, even though many religions recognize that Jesus existed, they all have differing and conflicting accounts of him. So how then do we decide which account to accept? Because I honestly don’t get why they should even have different accounts in the first place, if they’re actually talking about the same person.
    For example, the Hindus say Jesus lived in Asia as a teenager and practiced yogic traditions, returning home to become a Jewish guru. He’s also said to be an incarnation of the god Vishnu.
    The Baha’ii’llah, who claimed to be the last messenger of God put Jesus in the same class as Abraham, Muhammad, Buddha, Krishna, Zoroaster and himself.
    I’m sure you don’t believe any of these to be true, right? Don’t forget also that religions like Buddhism and Hinduism are umbrella religions for a mix of several traditional/religions beliefs of numerous gods and goddesses which goes contrary to Jesus’ teachings so you might wanna step easy there. Consider also the diverse brands of Christianity and their doctrines, and you’ll see what I mean.
    Now I’m guessing you are xtian, so am I hence I’d suggest we approach this from a lay-xtian angle. How come all “evidence” we have of Jesus can only be proven in the Bible and not in real life?
    We must understand that information was not readily available to people of old like it is today, thanks to technological advancement. People back then depended more on hearsay and rumors.
    Like I mentioned in a comment on your previous article, it’s very likely Jesus was a man popular for his talents but there’s good reason to agree that his abilities may have been exaggerated or even misrepresented, which gives us more cause to want to verify these claims by putting them simple tests which results can be available to us today, and can convince everyone including diehard atheists on what to believe or not.
    I hope you get my point.
    Thanks.
    0

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

+